SARIN RECIPE

again...welcome back to war! HELLO JIHAD ! So I'm giving you here the sarin gas recipe , for any student of chemestry is very easy to make! "into a very dry 2000 ml round bottom flask, the following ingredients are added, quickly, one after the other with swirling to mix them a few boiling chips, 800 ml anhydrous ethyl ether, 284 grams of methyl ethoxyphosphoryl chloride, 212 grams of dimethylaminoethanethiol, and 212 grams of triethylamine. it is very important that the glassware be very dry, and that the ingredients espescially the methyl ethoxyphosphoryl chloride be protected from moisture, because the presence of water really lowers the yield in this this reaction.
when the ingredients have been added and mixed, a good efficient condenser topped with a drying tube is attached to the flask and a flow of very cold water is put trought the condenser .
the contents of the flask are heated to boiling with a hot water bath and the reflux is maintened for one hour.
the byproduct of this reaction, hydrogen chloride, is absorbed by the tiethylamine as it is produced, forming triethylamine hydrochloride cristal cristal
at the end of the eating period, the mixture is cooled and the cristal of triethylamine hydrochloride are filtred out in a Buchner funnel.
the filtered reaction mixture is then returned to 2000 ml round bottom flask, a few boiling chips added, the glassware set up for simple distillation and the ether removed by distilling it of under a gentle vacuum.an aspirator is perfect for this job since it will flush the ether fumes down the drain.
when most of the ether is gone, the mixture is poured into a 1000 ml round bottom flask with a few boiling chips. the remnants in the 2000 ml flask can be rinsed out with ether an poured into the 1000 ml flask. once again this flask is set up for a simple distillation and full aspirator is applied to it. the last of the triethylamine and ether (bp 88 C°) will be gone shortly.
now a vacuum from a good quality vacuum pump is applied to the distillation. A vacuum of less 1 mmHg is to be preferred here to keep the distillation temperatures reasonnable and to avoid burning product. BE CAREFUL THE PUMP MUST NOT BE STOPPED DURING THE DISTILLATION. IF THE PUMP STOP,RUN OUT AND NEVER COMME BACK !!!
after a small forerun is collected in a 250 ml flask, a 500 ml flask is attached and the main bulk of the product is collected at a boiling point of 80 C° at a vacuum of 0.6 mmHg.
the yield is 260 to 275 ml of product. a fair amount of tar remains in the distilling flask.

Boas! welcome back to war! last night I talked about phosgene, IWW nervouse gas. Everybody started having ideas. Nothing is better, than to make it yourself . phosgene occurs when chloroform is decomposed as storage. What you need to do, is to prepare chloroform from calcium hypochlorite and acetone. Here's the cook receipt. So preparation of 28.6 g of Ca(ClO)2. Put the prepared bleaching powder in the flask of the apparatus pictured on pic.2. Also put there 75 ml of water. Put a mixture of 10 ml of water and 10 ml of acetone in the dropping funnel. The end of the dropping funnel must be lower than the level of liquid in the flask. Put 10 ml of water in the receiver to preserve the prepared chloroform from evaporation and to guarantee it's purification from acetone. Start introducing acetone drop by drop into the flask, heating the flak with the aid of a flask heater. If the reaction is too vigorous and the reaction mixture starts splattering into the reciever, heating of the flask should be stopped...any chemestry student does this for fun. REMEMBER WHEN STORAGE PHOSGENE NATURAL OCCURS ON THE TOP OF THE CONTAINER

again..and again...welcome back to war! Jihad, you might like to know, about organic cholorine, also known (among other chemical war agents) as phosphene who killed 90% of soldiers on the IWW. it occurs naturally, if combustion happens on refrigator system of industrial equipmments. But even, much easier to produce this chemical war gas, is just syntetize, carbon monoxide and chlorine to sunlight.

again...so yesterday , Jihad, I told you about mercury chloride high toxic cloud as dangerouse as sarin. How to make mercury choloride? ok, its really very simple, you take the mercury out of switches, and you mortar with make a mortar with table salt, than you pestle until it form a solid.

again...welcome back to war! mercury chloride is very high toxic on the solid form (you can carry solid espheres anywhere) , 0.2-0.4g fatal dose, however if evaporate on heat, (imagine you do that inside the airport...) it creates very dangerouse vapours , a very high toxic cloud. as dangerouse as sarin

well Mossad it's called "liquid" metal because the alloys retain the amorphous characteristics of liquids, but not crystallizing, another liquid US Intelligence Community able to penetrate tanks is galium..., because it crystalizes at hot temperatures, and bullets reach 90F when shooted Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), so if the bullet has on the slug some galium, it will get solid before it hits the target DEBKAfile

Amorphous Steel Composites with Enhanced Strengths, Elastic Properties and Ductilities 
US 20090025834 A1

"this invention was made with United States Government support under ONR Grant No. N00014-01-1-0961, awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency/Office of Naval Research. The United States Government has certain rights in the invention." ..."2) building structures, 3) armor penetrators, armor penetrating projectiles.."

Welcome back to war! Another quickest way Jihad, to penetrate armour, is to add an organic chemical like cyanide powder before swaging the metal power inside the bullet (whatever calibre) , because it gives tones of pressure while hiting the targets, since it decomposes trillion of times

the syrians have sarin, kept away from the french comitive to take it away few years ago...the question is, about ammo's is that 1. sarin at the end of the bullet 2 any toxin producing cancer like thorazine 3. compressing the all tungsteen with ricin ...either the ways, you end up fucked!

For those curiouse about the teflon coated of a bullet cop killer...I digged, its simple as spray the bullet. either .22 caliber or 5.27 military grade

Fusing of AP shells in battleship guns & Time of flight input

Fusing of AP shells in battleship guns

Did any one every try fuses which depended on a time-of-flight input ?

It seems to me that if a shell contacts the target toward the end of
its flight, in a plunging trajectory, then it is more likely to
contact the deck armor and plunge through the depth of the ship.
Ideally it would go clean through bottom of the hull and hole the
boat, giving torpedo-like effectiveness. A long delay fuse would be
better for this.

If the shell strikes the ship early in its trajectory, then it is more
likely to strike the side armor. A short delay fuse which sets off the
charge within the guts of the ship would be more useful than a long
delay which allowed the shell to penetrate the width of the ship.

To do this, the shell would have to have two fuses, with the handover
between the two fuses set to occur by elapsed seconds after leaving
the gun.

In fact this was accomplished by using a base fuzed shell which
exploded after a timed period from hitting the armour, This
is much easier to manage that having to set fuze delays continually
as the range changes. The magic bullet for destroying a ship is
not punching a 16" hole in the bottom then setting of a 50lb HE
charge in the water. Its much more effective to penetrate the
magazines and explode there which will completely destroy the
vessel. See Hood, Arizona , Roma etc

High explosive shells were designed to explode on contact
and used a noze fuze with a short delay and were useful against
unarmoured ships and to wreck the upperworks, directors
and radars of an armoured ship.

Apparently the German shells were better at penetration so they must
have haad some more suitable device to the RN's. There again we always
seemed to send out rowing boats out against their battleships.
It is surprising we won, isn't it.

Different fuze type entirely.

Shell fuzes were used a striker and pyrotechnic train and were very
reliable,

...

German guns used a higher muzzle velocity which gave them a
slightly higher penetration but this was offset to a great
degree by the better performance of British armour

Hood had thin deck armour that was not adequate to protect against plunging
fire which is why she was trying to close the range when hit.

"I seem to recall the pyrotechnic delay times in the 38 cm naval Bdz 38 was
.035 second. The BdZ 38 eV base fuzes for 20,3cm and 28cm AP and base fuzed
HE could be set to 0 delay, .015 second, or .035 second. There were a number
of base fuzes used in coastal battery ammunition which were marked KV and
these usually had a set .015 delay.

One thing I should add, even when set to 0 delay, there is still a finite
time between impact and fuze action in inertial type base fuzes; the time
delay figures are for the pyrotechnic element only, as far as I know."

Post by M***@hotmail.com
Did any one every try fuses which depended on a time-of-flight input ?

I really doubt that anyone tried that.
Impossible to accurately enough predict, because
until the shell has been fired, the time-of-flight
is varying.
Where, iirc, the AP fuze delay is measured in thousands of a second

While that is certainly true in the context of this
discussion, a time fuse was available for USN and RN
nose-fused battleship projectiles. Navweaps says the USN
ones were intended for AA, actual usage was for AP (from
memory, not Navweaps). Proximity fusing would have made them
obsolescent.

Aside from AA, which would absolutely require it until the development
of proximity fuzes, the only reason for it would be range safety. 'Do
not arm until x seconds after launch' to prevent damage to the ship.
As a premature that would damage the ship seems impossible, I really
doubt they would bother. Everything would be impact fuzed, with a
slight delay for armor piercing rounds.

http://sci.military.naval.narkive.com/zV2JZ5yJ/fusing-of-ap-shells-in-battleship-guns-time-of-flight-input

Can 5.56 Tracer Rounds Cause an Explosion !!?? (XM856)